THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
NAGARAJA RAO C H – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
In WP No.38111/2016, the petitioner has challenged the auction sale dated 26.08.2009, by which the sale was confirmed by respondent No.1 in favour of the respondent No.3, by a letter dated 16.10.2009 bearing No.KSFC/U/BO/1101/2009-10.
2 . In WP No.32969/2013, the petitioner being the auction purchaser has sought for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to execute a registered sale deed in respect of the property auctioned on 26.08.2009. He has also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to remove the unlawful/unauthorised occupation of the scheduled property by the borrowers and to evict them through the due process of law and to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to place him in lawful possession and enjoyment of the property. He has also sought for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to compensate him for the loss of time in not taking effective measures to execute the sale deed.
3. The petitioner in WP No.38111/2016 claims to be the owner of an immovable property bearing Nos.72 and 73 in survey No.198/1A, measuring 5 cents each in Varamballi Village, Udupi Taluk. The petitioner had developed the said properties in 4.35 ce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.