SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41606

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
NAGARAJA RAO C H – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

In WP No.38111/2016, the petitioner has challenged the auction sale dated 26.08.2009, by which the sale was confirmed by respondent No.1 in favour of the respondent No.3, by a letter dated 16.10.2009 bearing No.KSFC/U/BO/1101/2009-10.

2 . In WP No.32969/2013, the petitioner being the auction purchaser has sought for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to execute a registered sale deed in respect of the property auctioned on 26.08.2009. He has also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to remove the unlawful/unauthorised occupation of the scheduled property by the borrowers and to evict them through the due process of law and to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to place him in lawful possession and enjoyment of the property. He has also sought for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to compensate him for the loss of time in not taking effective measures to execute the sale deed.

3. The petitioner in WP No.38111/2016 claims to be the owner of an immovable property bearing Nos.72 and 73 in survey No.198/1A, measuring 5 cents each in Varamballi Village, Udupi Taluk. The petitioner had developed the said properties in 4.35 ce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top