SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41675

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K S HEMALEKHA
SUVARNA BAI LATE RUDROJI RAO – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMAN RAO – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants files memo in each appeal seeking to withdraw the present appeals as the valuation of the appeals do not exceed Rs.10,00,000/-.

2. The memo reads as under:

“In the above appeal, the Appellants/Plaintiffs prays that this Hon’ble Court may kindly permit them to withdraw the above appeal, as their share does not exceeds more 10 lakhs and mistakenly filed the above appeal before this Hon’ble Court. Wherefore, this Hon’ble Court may kindly permit the Appellants/Plaintiffs to withdraw the above appeal with a liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate Court and also kindly direct the Court to consider the delay occurred during the pendency of this appeal is filed to secure the ends of justice and equity.”

3. In view of the memo, the present appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal before the appropriate Court.

4. Liberty is reserved to the appellants to approach the appropriate forum and to seek exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in accordance with law.

5. Registry to return back the certified copies to the appellants.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top