2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 64819
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
SRI.J. MANJUNATH – Appellant
Versus
SRI. MAHABOOB PASHA – Respondent
WP 11277/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO. 11277 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI J. MANJUNATH
S/O LATE R. JAGANATH
C/O SRI V SATHYANARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
NO.452/2, 7TH MAIN
4TH B CROSS, OPPOSITE
VIRUPAKSESHWARA TEMPLE
HAMIPINAGARA R P C LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY, ADV., -ABSENT)
AND:
1. SRI MAHABOOB PASHA S/O S. MOHAMMED HANEEF
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
Digitally R/AT NO.857/A, 10TH CROSS
signed by GOKUL DEVANARAPALYA
NANDINI M S
BANGALORE - 560 054.
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF 2. SRI SHABEERULLA
KARNATAKA
S/O LATE H. KALANDAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT NO.1187/A, 1ST FLOOR
1ST D MAIN, 4TH CROSS
L N COLONY, YESHANTHPURA
BANGALORE - 560 022.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 21.02.2024 IN OS.NO.2160/2019 PASSED BY THE HONBLE PRL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BANGALORE AS PER
ANNEXURE-C AND THIS HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO RESTORE THE O.S.NO.2160/2019.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This Court on 26.11.2025 had passed the following order:-
"There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
This petition is listed for the 3rd time for non-compliance of office objections. Though this Court is not inclined to grant further time to the learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of indulgence, matter is finally adjourned to 08.12.2025 and in the event office objections are not complied by the next date of List this petition on 08.12.2025."
3. Even on this date, office objections have not been complied and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Having regard to the aforesaid and also having regard to the peremptory order passed by this Court on
26.11.2025, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is Sd/-
(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23