SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 64819

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
SRI.J. MANJUNATH – Appellant
Versus
SRI. MAHABOOB PASHA – Respondent
WP 11277/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

WRIT PETITION NO. 11277 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI J. MANJUNATH

S/O LATE R. JAGANATH

C/O SRI V SATHYANARAYANA

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

NO.452/2, 7TH MAIN

4TH B CROSS, OPPOSITE

VIRUPAKSESHWARA TEMPLE

HAMIPINAGARA R P C LAYOUT

VIJAYANAGAR

BENGALURU - 560 040.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY, ADV., -ABSENT)

AND:

1. SRI MAHABOOB PASHA S/O S. MOHAMMED HANEEF

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

Digitally R/AT NO.857/A, 10TH CROSS

signed by GOKUL DEVANARAPALYA

NANDINI M S

BANGALORE - 560 054.

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF 2. SRI SHABEERULLA

KARNATAKA

S/O LATE H. KALANDAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

R/AT NO.1187/A, 1ST FLOOR

1ST D MAIN, 4TH CROSS

L N COLONY, YESHANTHPURA

BANGALORE - 560 022.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 21.02.2024 IN OS.NO.2160/2019 PASSED BY THE HONBLE PRL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BANGALORE AS PER

ANNEXURE-C AND THIS HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO RESTORE THE O.S.NO.2160/2019.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. This Court on 26.11.2025 had passed the following order:-

"There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

This petition is listed for the 3rd time for non-compliance of office objections. Though this Court is not inclined to grant further time to the learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of indulgence, matter is finally adjourned to 08.12.2025 and in the event office objections are not complied by the next date of List this petition on 08.12.2025."

3. Even on this date, office objections have not been complied and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Having regard to the aforesaid and also having regard to the peremptory order passed by this Court on

26.11.2025, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top