SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 108819

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
SMT PARIMALA – Appellant
Versus
SMT POORNIMA VIJAY KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 196 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

SMT PARIMALA

W/O MOHAN,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.162,5TH CROSS,

II MAIN ROAD, PRAKASHNAGAR,

BENGALURU - 560 021.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI K. GOVINDARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI P. NEHRU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. POORNIMA VIJAY KUMAR,

W/O VIJAY KUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

NO.128, 5TH CROSS, L.N.PURAM,

Digitally signed bySRIRAMPURAM POST,

GEETHAKUMARI

BENGALURU - 560 021.

PARLATTAYA S …RESPONDENT

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka (BY SRI JAI PRAKASH RAO, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO

SET ASIDE ENTIRE IMPUGNED ORDER AND JUDGMENT PASSED BY LEARNED XX A.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.30592/2015 DATED 02.05.2017 AND ORDER DATED 03.06.2021, PASSED BY LEARNED LXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU IN

CRL.A.NO.804/2017.

THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I.A.,

THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL ORDER

Challenging concurrent, erroneous judgment dated

03.06.2021 passed by LXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Crl.A.no.804/2017 con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top