Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH, J
Sri Mulla Syed Mohammed Hussain S/o Amanath Makhdom Mulla – Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority And Special Officer IMA Andother Kpidfe Act Cases, Bengaluru – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of notice challenged under statutory provisions. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioners given liberty to seek relief from the competent authority. (Para 3) |
| 3. judgment concludes with petition disposal. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
2. In these writ petitions, petitioners are assailing the Notice issued by the respondent/competent authority under the Provisions of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act , 2004.
4. With these observations, these writ petitions are disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
