THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
MRS ASMA YUSUF SIWANI ALIAS ASMA HILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
WP 31932/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO. 31932 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. MRS ASMA YUSUF SIWANI @ ASMA HILAL
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
DAUGHTER OF LATE YUSUF KASAM SIWANI, RESIDING AT NO. 2504, THALAI 1ST STREET,
6TH MAIN ROAD, GOMATHIPURAM, MELAMADAI,
GANDHINAGAR, MADURAI NORTH,
TAMIL NADU - 625 020.
2. MR. HANIF JUSAB SIWANI @ H. J. SIWANI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
SON OF LATE YUSUF KASAM SIWANI,
RESIDING AT NO. 15/3, BINNY CRESCENT,
BENSON TOWN, BENGLAURU - 560 046
Digitally signed by
3. MR. MEHBOOB YUSUF SIWANI @ M. J. SIWANI
ARUNKUMAR M S
Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
COURT OF
SON OF LATE YUSUF KASAM SIWANI,
KARNATAKA
RESIDING AT NO. 15/3, BINNY CRESCENT,
BENSON TOWN, BENGLAURU - 560 046 4. MRS. NASIMA FAROOK SUNDKA @
NASIMA YUSUF SIWANI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
DAUGHTER OF LATE YUSUF KASAM SIWANI,
RESIDING AT NO. 315, 8TH CROSS, LAKSHMI ROAD,
DIVYA SHREE CHAMBERS,
SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SYED KHAMRUDDIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SPB BRANCH, OFFICE AT ST. MARKS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SADHANA S. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I.ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.09.2025 MADE BY THE 1 PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT BANK PRIOR TO TAKING ANY COERSIVE ACTION RESPECT OF THE SUBJECT SAFE DEPOSIT LOCKER BEARING NO. C-22/925. ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking writ of mandamus to the respondent to consider representation dated 24.09.2025, addressed to the respondent-State Bank of India (Annexure-A) and to permit petitioner No.1 to operate the locker and remove the articles from the subject safe deposit locker bearing No.C-22 /925.
3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the petitioners herein are under process of securing the Succession Certificate before the competent Court as required under law to establish their right with the deceased in whose name the locker is standing as per the records of the respondent-Bank, it is open for the petitioners to approach the respondent-Bank with adequate material to establish their right over the deceased's assets.
4. It is also made clear that since the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that, the petitioners are in the process of securing the Succession Certificate as required under law before a competent Court, till such time, no precipitative action shall be taken by the Bank to open the aforementioned locker belonging to the deceased sister of the petitioner No. 1.
With this observation, writ petition is disposed of Sd/-
(E.S.INDIRESH)
JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.