Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
H.P.SANDESH, J
SRI. CHANDRU – Appellant
Versus
SRI.HUCCHARAYAPPA HANUMANTHAPPA HULLINAKATTI @ S.BANAKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims parentage and seeks share in property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. importance of dna testing to resolve paternity disputes. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. defendant's burden to prove non-parentage; reliance on evidence is critical. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard the petitioner’s counsel and also the counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. The petitioner is the plaintiff before the Trial Court and he filed the suit against defendant No.1 claiming that he is his father and also content that he is entitled for share in the suit schedule properties and also sought for mense profits. The suit is registered by the defendants and defendant No.1 specifically denied that the plaintiff is not the son of him.
5. Defendant No.1 is denying that he is not the son. In order to determine the plaintiff is the son of defendant No.1 or not, DNA test is necessary. Apart from the witnesses who have been examined before the Court, the said application is registered by filing written statement by defendant No.1 contending that the plaintiff's mother married one Basappa Jadara and she was also claiming after the death of her husband widow pension and having five children through the Basap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
