Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
H.P.SANDESH, J
SRI. CHANDRU – Appellant
Versus
SRI.HUCCHARAYAPPA HANUMANTHAPPA HULLINAKATTI @ S.BANAKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims parentage and seeks share in property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. importance of dna testing to resolve paternity disputes. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. defendant's burden to prove non-parentage; reliance on evidence is critical. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Heard the petitioner’s counsel and also the counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. The prayer sought in the writ petition is to quash the impugned order dated 02.08.2019 on I.A.No.6 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Hirekerur rejecting the same in O.S.No.5/2017 vide Annexure-F to grant such other reliefs as deems fit in the circumstances of the case.
3. The petitioner is the plaintiff before the Trial Court and he filed the suit against defendant No.1 claiming that he is his father and also content that he is entitled for share in the suit schedule properties and also sought for mense profits. The suit is registered by the defendants and defendant No.1 specifically denied that the plaintiff is not the son of him.
4. The Trial Court also considering the pleadings of the party, framed the issues and parties are also allowed to lead the evidence. The plaintiff a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
