IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1968 OF 2011 (PAR)

BETWEEN:

SRI. M NARAYANAREDDY

SON OF.LATE VENKATAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE,

VARTHUR HOBLI,

BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. VIJAY GOWDA L, ADVOCATE FOR LRS OF APPELLANT

(ABSENT))

AND:

1. SRI. MANJUNATHA REDDY

SON OF M NARAYANA REDDY

RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE

VARTHUR HOBLI

Digitally signed

by BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133.

SHARADAVANI

B

2. SMT G KAVITHA

Location: High

Court of WIFE OF LATE VENKATESH REDDY

Karnataka

RESIDING AT PAPPIREDDYPALYA

DANKANIKOTE TALUK,

DHARMAPURI DISTRICT,

TAMIL NADU STATE - 581 151.

3. KUMARI. MAMTHA

DAUGHTER OF KARIAHA

AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, MINOR, RESIDING AT PAPPIREDDYPALYA

DANKANIKOTE TALUK, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT,

TAMIL NADU STATE - 581 151.

4. SRI. HEMANTHA REDDY SON OF M NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133.

5. SMT. M RADHAMMA DAUGHTER OF M NARAYANA REDDY RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133.

6. SRI. MUNIKRISHNA REDDY SON OF M NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133.

7. SRI. PRATHIBHA DAUGHTER OF M NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133.

8. SMT.MUNIYAMMA, DAUGHTER OF LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK – 562 113.

…RESPONDENTS R2, R5, R6, R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;

VIDE ORDER DATED 12.08.2013, NOTICE TO R4 IS HELD SUFFICIENT;

R3 IS MINOR AND REPRESENTED BY R8)

THIS RFA IS FILED U/O-41, R-1, R/W, SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.09.2011 PASSED IN O.S.4390/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-44, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR THE PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

None appears for the appellants. Amendment is not carried out. Cost is not paid vide Court order dated 14.11.2025 and 02.12.2025.

Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

(V SRISHANANDA)

JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0