SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 438785

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAJESH RAI K
MR ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

WRIT PETITION NO. 58157 OF 2018 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

MR. ABDUL RAZAK

S/O AHAMAD BEARY

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

OCC: AGRICULTURIST

R/AT IRVATTHURU PADAVU HOUSE,

IRVATTHURU VILLAGE

BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,

DEPT. OF REVENUE,

Digitally signed M.S. BUILDING,

by

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

SHARADAVANI

B BENGALURU - 560 001.

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

D.K. DISTRICT, MANGALORE - 575 001.

3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION

OF UN-AUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF THE

GOVT. LANDS, BANTWAL TALUK,

D.K. DISTRICT,

BY ITS SECRETARY/TAHSILDAR - 574 219.

4. SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT MONITORING COMMITTEE

REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT

D.K.Z.P. HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, MOODUPADUKODY, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 219.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. G. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2018 IN APPEAL NO.1156/2012 (REVENUE) PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top