THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
M/S BLUEFISH PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP 19351/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 19351 OF 2024 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S BLUEFISH PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/DIRECTOR
SHRI VIVEKANANDAN SUNDARAMURHTY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
SON OF SUNDARAMURTHY
RESIDING AT: NO. 110-B,
J S HARMONY APARTMETN 3RD MAIN, T.C PALYA ROAD
HORAMAVU, BENGALURU - 560 043.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARAT RAICHANDANI, AND
SRI. RAAGHUL PIRAANESH, AND
SRI. CHANDRAKIRAN.K, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY HEREIN BY
Digitally signed THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
by CHANDANA MINISTRY OF FINANCE
B M GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Location: High NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001.
Court of
Karnataka
2. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE CHAIRMAN
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001.
3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL
TAXES LGSTO -038
LGSTO-038, II , 2ND FLOOR
HAL-2ND STAGE
DEFENCE COLONY
INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 038.
4. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS)-5 SHANTHI NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 027.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NISHAN UNNI.P, CGC FOR R-1 SMT.JYOTHI.M.MARADI, HCGP FOR R-2 TO R-4)
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 107(11) OF THE CGST ACT VIDE ORDER NO.ZD2904240547833 DATED 22.04.2024, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT 4TH ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-B AS BAD IN LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“ a) Issue a writ of certiorari, or a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari and set aside the Impugned Order passed under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act vide Order No.ZD2904240547833 dated: 22.04.2024, issued by the 4th Respondent enclosed as Annexure-B as bad in law.
b) Issue a writ of certiorari, or a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari and to hold that the Refund Rejection Order in Form GST RFD-06 vide No.ACCT-LGSTO-38/RFD-06/2023-24 dated: 24.05.2023, enclosed as Annexure-G issued by 3rd Respondent was passed without the authority of law and without jurisdiction.
C) Issue a writ of mandamus, or a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus by ordering the Respondent No.3 to refund the accumulated/unutilized ITC available in the electronic credit ledger along with interest.
d) Issue any other direction or grant any other relief, as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice.
e) Issue a direction to provide for the cost of this petition.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned CGC as well as learned HCGP for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. The material on record will indicate that the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing Research and Development services and other business support services to its Parent company namely Bluefish Pharmaceuticals AB, Sweden. During the period April, 2022 to September, 2022, the petitioner having provided export of services, Export Invoices were issued with an endorsement “Export of Services without payment of IGST” under the Letter of Undertaking (LUT). It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the petitioner is not an ‘intermediary’, was entitled to refund of accumulated / unutilized input tax credit (ITC) available in their Electronic credit ledger on account of the export of services without payment of IGST, the refund application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the respondents by passing the impugned order, against which, the petitioner filed appeal, which is also dismissed by the respondents. Aggrieved by the impugned orders passed by the respondents rejecting refund application / claim of the petitioner and confirmed by the appellate aut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.