SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 439693

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
SRI N RAGHUMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 38018/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

WRIT PETITION NO. 38018 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI N RAGHUMURTHY

SON OF T. NINGAPPA NAYAKA

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

RESIDING AT

NO. 264, VAISHNAVI NILAYA 1ST MAIN, VINAYAKA LAYOUT

HANUMAGIRI TEMPLE

NAGARBAVI, BENGALURU

KARNTAKA 560 072

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SREEVATSA., SR. ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. T N VISWANATHA.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Digitally signed REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

by SHWETHA REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

RAGHAVENDRA

M. S. BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA,

Location: HIGH

DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

COURT OF

KARNATAKA BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 001.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

KG ROAD,

NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA,

BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560009.

3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

KG ROAD,

NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA,

BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560009.

4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KANDAYA BHAVAN, 2ND FLOOR, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD (K.G. ROAD), BENGALURU, KARNATAKA -560009.

5. THE TAHSILDHAR NO.15, 4TH FLOOR, ABOVE SHARAVATHI HOTEL, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560064.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH., AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT BY THE IMPUGNED COMMUNICATIONS DATED 14/11/2025, 04/12/2025 BEARING NO. A.L.N/JAALA/C.R/28/2023-2024 AND NO. L.N.D/Y/C.R/166/2023-24 ADDRESSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TO THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND INTURN COMMUNICATION BEARING NO. LDN/YLK/CR/ 87/2025-26 ADDRESSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH TO THE TAHSILDHAR DATED 09/12/2025 WITH A DIRECTION TO LODGE AN FIR UNDER SECTION 192(A) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AT THE JURISDICTIONAL POLICE STATION AND TO SUBMIT THE REPORT ALONG WITH THE FIR AND RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AT ANNEXURES - A, B AND C RESPECTIVELY, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents.

2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ by quashing the impugned communications dated 14/11/2025, 04/12/2025 bearing No. A.L.N/Jaala/C.R/28/2023-2024 and L.N.D/Y/C.R/166/ 2023-24 addressed by the Deputy Commissioner to the Assistant Commissioner and in turn communication bearing No. LDN/YLK/CR: 87/2025-26 addressed by the Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru North to the Tahsildhar dated 09/12/2025 with a direction to lodge an FIR under Section 192(A) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 at the jurisdictional Police Station and to submit the report along with the FIR and relevant documents at ANNEXURES - A, B and C respectively, issued by the Respondent authorities.

b) Issue any other appropriate Writ or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the case.

c) And this Writ Petition may be allowed with costs, in the interest of justice and equity.

3. The short grievance of the petitioner is that without issuing any notice, criminal proceedings for offence under Section 192A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 is proposed to be initiated against the petitioner, which is in violation of the orders passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this court vide its order dated 22.09.2008 in WP No. 3969 and 9198 of 2007.

4. Learned AGA, on instructions, submits that before initiating criminal proceedings against the petitioner, a notice would be issued to the petitioner and the petitioner would be given an opportunity to reply to the same and thereafter necessary orders would be passed. The said submission answers the grievance of the petitioner.

5. The petition stands disposed accordingly SD/-

(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl.No.: 37

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top