THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
KALPATHARU SCHOOL OF NURSING – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE DIPLOMA IN NURSING EXAMINATION BOARD – Respondent
WP 38086/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 38086 OF 2025 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. KALPATHARU SCHOOL OF NURSING
HALEKOTE, BELTHANGADY POST,
DAKSHINA KANNADA (DISTRICT)
KARNATAKA – 574 214.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
MRS.CHANDRIKA
2. AIBANRISHA K BANI
D/O JOSEEP GARAI A
AGED 21 YEARS
3. ALPHONSA SOREN
D/O BINOY SOREN
AGED 23 YEARS
4. ANJOLA MARANDI
D/O SAIMAN MARANDI
Digitally signed AGED 18 YEARS
by CHANDANA
B M
5. ARUNA MINZ
Location: High
D/O GABRIAL MINZ
Court of
Karnataka AGED 27 YEARS
6. BALARITY NONGBRI
D/O BERNARDUS NONGBRI
7. BANDANA MURMU
D/O BINOD MURMU
8. BANTINISHA KAHSHAH D/O QUEENTINA KAHSHAH AGED 22 YEARS
9. BINISHA KHARSNAR D/O JUSTIN SANGRIANG AGED 22 YEARS
10. BOKLIN SYIEMLIEH D/O PARMANES LYNGKHOI AGED 24 YEARS
11. CHANDANA MURMU D/O BINO MURMU AGED 27 YEARS
12. JASINTA HEMBRAM D/O ANJOY HEMBRAM AGED 22 YEARS
13. JENITA RYNNIAW D/O BANSHAI WAHIANG AGED 20 YEARS
14. JULI MARANDI D/O HAKAN MARANDI AGED 20 YEARS
15. KYNJAILIN NONGREM D/O WINSHON LYNGKHOI AGED 19 YEARS
16. LIENMUNCHONG TRIPURA D/O RANJIT TRIPURA AGED 27 YEARS
17. MERABLE SOHLAMAR D/O SOHLAMAR
18. MERISHAI SYIEM D/O AIDWIN MA WKHYILONG
19. MUNIA MURMU D/O HARUN MURMU AGED 25 YEARS
20. PATRISHA LAWPHNIAW D/O HENRY LYNGKHOI AGED 23 YEARS
21. RINA MARDI D/O LUBIN MARDI AGED 21 YEARS
22. RIYA KUJUR D/O RAIMON KUJUR AGED 22 YEARS
23. SHILA MURMU D/O SUNIL MURMU AGED 25 YEARS
24. SIMRAN D/O TARSEM SING AGED 22 YEARS
25. SUKHPREET KARUR D/O ANGERI SING AGED 21 YEARS
26. VENIGRACE LAWPHINAW D/O VALENTINE PANGNIANG AGED 20 YEARS
27. VERONICA MURMU D/O CHARLES MURMU AGED 20 YEARS
28. ZAREENA RYNNIAW D/O ANNISHAI LYNGDOH
29. BERONICA KISKU D/O GOPILAL KISKU
30. ANITA BASKG D/O PRABHU BASKG AGED 21 YEARS
31. SITALI KISKU D/O MUNSHI KISKU AGED 22 YEARS PETITIONERS 2 TO 31 ARE STUDENTS OF
1ST PETITIONER SCHOOL.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARUDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. KARNATAKA STATE DIPLOMA IN NURSING EXAMINATION BOARD REP. ITS SECRETARY, 1ST FLOOR, LIBRARY BLOCK, BMC AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE CAMPUS, BANGALORE – 560 0025
2. KARNATAKA STATE NURSING AND PARAMEDICAL EDUCATION (REGULATION) AUTHORITY REP. ITS SECRETARY, 1ST FLOOR, LIBRARY BLOCK, BMC AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE CAMPUS, BANGALORE – 560 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUDHARSHAN SURESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT BOARD TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ADMISSIONS OF THE PETITIONER STUDENTS
2 TO 31 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Board to consider and approve the admissions of the petitioner student No.2 to 31;
(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Board to issue hall ticket by accepting the approval / examination fee and permit the petitioner students 2 to 31 to take up the 1st year GNM examination scheduled to commence from 29.12.2025 vide Annexure-D;
(iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations made by the 1st petitioner in the interest of the students vide Annexure-C dated 21.01.2025;
(iv) Pass any order or issue any direction this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the respondent No.1 – Board has not considered the representation / request made by the petitioners vide Annexure-C dated 21.01.2025, the respondent No.1 may be directed to consider the same and take appropriate decision / pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time frame.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.1-Board submits that if reasonable time is granted, the respondent No.1- Board shall consider the said application filed by the petitioners at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.