SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 439914

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
SRI RAMAKRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER BMTC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M

WRIT PETITION NO. 9169 OF 2021 (L-KSRTC)

BETWEEN:

SRI RAMAKRISHNA

S/O PEDDANNA,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

HARAPANAHALLI VILLAGE,

JIGANI POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. KANTHARAJA V., ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,

B.M.T.C., SOUTH DIVISION / REGION,

CENTRAL OFFICE, SHANTHINAGAR,

Di gitally signed BENGALURU - 560027.

by THEJAS …RESPONDENT

KUMAR N

(BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE)

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN

RELIEFS.

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS

UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri Kantharaja V., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.H.R.Renuka, counsel for the respondent have appeared in person.

2. The writ petition is filed to quash the award dated

11.12.2018, passed by the III Addl. Labor Court, Bengaluru in ID No.25/2017 vide Annexure-J. 3. The short facts are these:

The petitioner was working as a driver. He remained absent from duty from 19.08.2011 without prior intimation, permission or sanction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top