THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
M/S G M INFINITE DWELLING INDIA PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) – Respondent
WP 21787/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.21787 OF 2024 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
1. M/S G M INFINITE DWELLING INDIA PVT LTD.,
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT 1956,
HAVING OFFICE AT NO.6, G M PEARL, BTM LAYOUT,
I STAGE, I PHASE,
BENGLAURU - 560 068.
REPLRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
SRI JAWED HUSSAIN,
S/O LATE SRI. GULAM RASOOL,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
2. SRI. GULAM MUSTAFA
DIRECTOR OF M/S G M INFINITE
DWELLING INDIA PVT LTD
Digitally signed by
AASEEFA PARVEEN S/O LATE SRI GULAM RASOOL
Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
COURT OF
RESIDING AT NO. 66
KARNATAKA
3RD MAIN, 15TH CROSS
6TH SECOTR HSR LAYOUT
BANGALORE - 560 102.
3. SRI. JAWED HUSSAIN
DIRECTOR OF M/S G M INFINITE
DWELLING INDIA PVT LTD
S/O LATE SRI GULAM RASOOL
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 1/1
4TH CROSS,
MADIWALA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 068.
…PETITIONERS (BY SMT. VANI H.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), HMT BHAVAN, NO. 59 BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE 1(1)
HMT BHAVAN, NO. 59 BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER BEARING DIN AND ORDER NO. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024- 25/1065319712(1) DTD. 31.05.2024 PASSED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 279(1) OF THE ACT VIDE ANNX-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition the petitioners seeks for the following reliefs:
"a. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order bearing DIN & Order No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1065319712(1)
dated 31.05.2024 passed by the first respondent under Section 279(1) of the Act vide Annexure-F, b. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the Criminal Case registered as CC Nos.199/2024 and 200/2024 filed by the second respondent on the files of the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bengaluru in which the summons dated 8.7.2024 vide Annexure-G, Annexure-G1 and Annexure-G2 are issued to petitioners, c. Pass such other Writ or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the present case."
2. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that for the assessment year 2016-2017, the petitioner deducted tax at source (TDS) and remitted the said amount to the credit of the Central Government by 17.08.2016, after 7 months along with penal interest.
Subsequently, on 14.01.2020, the second respondent issued a notices to the petitioners seeking explanation as to why prosecution proceedings should not be recommended against the petitioners on account of the delayed payment deduction of TDS by the petitioners. The petitioners having submitted replies dated 20.01.2020 and 28.01.2020, the first respondent issued show cause notices dated 15.03.2024 and 30.04.2024 to which the petitioners submitted detailed replies dated 16.02.2024 and 02.05.2024, interalia contending that the reasonable cause for delayed payment of TDS was on account of demonetization policy and subsequent GST implementation as also the COVID-19 pandemic on account of which the company faced financial loss and cash flows where cash flow was badly affected and huge monies had to be borrowed from NBFC's by way of debentures to run the business activities. It is submitted on instructions that the petitioners also requested time to produce additional documents in support of its claim.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid notices and replies, the respondent proceeded to pass the impugned order dated 31.05.2024 granting sanction for prosecution under Section 276B read with Section 278B of the Income Tax Act, aggrieved by which the petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petition.
4. Per contra learned counsel for the respondents would reiterate the various contentions urged in the statement o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.