THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
SYNGENE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
WP 28333/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 28333 OF 2024 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
SYNGENE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
HAVING OFFICE AT, BIOCON PARK, SEZ,
BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA,
PHASE-IV, BOMMASANDRA
BANGALORE - 560 099.
REPRESENTED BY HEREIN BY ITS
ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT
FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS
MR. MANOJ GUPTA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
AND:
AASEEFA PARVEEN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
KARNATAKA
CIRCLE-6(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BANGALORE - 560 095.
2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX-1, BMTC BUILDING
6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD
KORAMANGALA,
BANGALORE - 560 095.
3. CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTER
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE
ASSITANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC POST BAG NO.1, ELECTRONIC CITY BENGALURU - 560 500.
4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEMS)
ARA CENTER, GROUDN FLOOR, E-2, JHANDEWALAN EXTESNION, NEW DELHI - 110055.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH REFUND AN AMOUNT OF RS. 17,78,24,964/- DETERMINED VIDE ORDER DATED 27.07.2023 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/M/143(3)/2023-24/1054710203(1) FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 (ANNEXURE- A), ALONG WITH APPLICABLE INTEREST UNTIL PAYMENT OF THE REFUND AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
2. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that pursuant to the refund request made by the petitioner for the assessment years granted/sanction refund in favour of the petitioner for the assessment year 2010- 2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. Subsequently, insofar as assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 are concerned, the respondents who passed assessment orders against the petitioner raising demands which were challenged by the petitioner before the appellate authority by depositing 20% of the disputed tax pursuant to the assessment order.
3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the petitioner had deposited 20% of the disputed tax at the time of filing the appeal before the appellate authority and the said appeal is pending adjudication as on today, the respondents have proceeded to adjust the refund payable in favour of the petitioner without taking into account the 20% deposit already made by the petitioner and declined to grant refund in favour of the petitioner who is before this Court by way of the present petition. He has placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in M/S. Price Waterhouse, Bangalore vs. National Faceless appeal centre, Delhi and others in W.P.No.23784/2024
4. Per contra learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that subsequent to sanctioning/granting refund in favour of the petitioner for the assessment years 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, the petitioner has also deposited 20% of the disputed tax amount at the time of filing an appeal which are pending before the appellate authority. For the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016- 2017, under identical circumstances in M/s.Price Waterhouse, Bangalore case supra, this Court held as under:
In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following relief's:
“(i) Directing the 3rd Respondent to forthwith refund Rs.21,08,91,940/-, being demand recovered in excess of 20% of the demand raised for the assessment year 2012-
13, along with applicable interest;
(ii) Directing the 1st / 2nd Respondent to dispose of the appeal pending before it for the assessment year 2012-13 in App
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.