THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
M/S IFPL – Appellant
Versus
K R MOHAN KUMAR – Respondent
WP 5853/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5853 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
M/S IFPL,
THE PARTNERSHIP FIRM
HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH AT NO. 12
I MAIN, 4TH FLOOR, VIDYARANYAPURA
BENGALURU 560 097 REP. BY ITS PARTNER
RAMESH N
S/O G NARAYANAIAH
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT 12, I MAIN, 4TH FLOOR
VIDYARANYAPURA
BENGALURU 560 097
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ABHINAY Y T.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed 1. K R MOHAN KUMAR
by S/O RAJU
GAVRIBIDANUR
KOPPA VILLAGE, HARANAHALLI HOBLI
SUBRAMANYA
GUPTA PERIYAPATNA TALUK
SREENATH
MYSURU DISTRICT 571 107
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
2. JANARDAN BT
KARNATAKA
S/O THIMAPPA BR
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
BYLAKUPPE VILLAGE
BM ROAD, HARANAHALLI HOBLI
PERIYAPATTANA TALUK
MYSURU 571 107
3. VENKATESH ST S/O LATE SB THIPPAIAH MULSOGE VILLAGE, BASAVESHWARA BLOCK, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI SOMAVARPETE TALUK KODAGU 571 201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RITISH R.NAIK., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.T.P.
VIVEKANANDAADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3;
NOTICE TO R-1 DISPENSED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED
18.12.2025)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 18.12.2024 PASSED ON IA NO. 5 IN OS NO. 153/2022 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PERIYAPATNA (ANNX-D)
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondents.
2. This petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 18.12.2024 passed on I.A. No.5 in O.S. No.153/2022 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Periyapatna.
3. Parties shall be referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.
4. Petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit against respondent No.1/defendant No.1 for the relief of specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 8.4.2021 with respect to property bearing Sy.No.22/1 measuring 39 guntas in Sy.No.22/1 of Manchadevanahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Periyapatna taluk, Mysore district. The defendant No.1 appeared before the Court, filed the written statement and in the written statement, he has stated that he has sold the suit schedule property to Respondent Nos.2 and 3 by virtue of the registered sale deed dated 21.1.2022. On coming to know of such a sale deed through the written statement filed by defendant No.1, the plaintiff filed an application - I.A. No.5 to implead the subsequent purchasers as defendant Nos.2 and 3 in the suit. The said application came to be heard on service of notice to the proposed defendant Nos.2 and 3, the learned trial Judge dismissed the application for impleadment only on the ground that the plaintiff has not produced any document to show that the proposed defendants purchased the suit schedule property and so also the original defendant No.1 has not produced any such material.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff vehemently contends that the impugned order is unsustainable as it is contrary to the facts and so also law and the judgments of this Court and the Apex Court. It is contended by learned counsel that the petitioner/plaintiff came to know of the alienation made by Respondent Nos.2 and 3/proposed defendant Nos.2 and 3 as it was stated so by Respondent No.1/defendant No.1 in the written statement, pursuant to which the application came to be filed in I.A. No.5 to implead the proposed defendants as parties to the suit proceedings. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff that the learned trial Judge without going into these aspects of the sale deed and despite noting the age of the sale deed as claimed by the plaintiff, rejected the application solely on the ground that plaintiff has not produced copy of the sale deed. The same is not the correct proposition of law especially in the suit for specific performance.
6. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for respondents fairly submits that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have no objection f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.