##PAGE1##

- 1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:54359-DB

MFA No. 7697 of 2022

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7697 OF 2022 (MC)

BETWEEN:

SMT.LAKSHMIDEVI D @ PREMA,

W/O RANGANATH M.B,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

OCC: HOUSEWIFE,

R/AT: RAJAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,

CHANNAGIRI TALUK,

DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI.M.R.HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE)

Digitally

AND:

signed by K G

RENUKAMBA

Location: RANGANATHA.M.B,

HIGH COURT SON OF BASAPPA,

OF

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

KARNATAKA

OCC: POLICE CONSTABLE,

R/AT: EREHALLI VILLAGE,

CHANNAGIRI TALUK,

DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.HITESH GOWDA.B.J, ADVOCATE

FOR SRI.ADITYA.D, ADVOCATE)

- 2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:54359-DB

MFA No. 7697 of 2022

HC-KAR

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF HINDU

MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE

DATED 10.10.2022 PASSED IN M.C.NO.28/2019 ON THE FILE

OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI,

ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1),(ia)

AND (ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS

DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

AND

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

The appeal was filed by the wife, who was the

respondent in MC No.28/2019 which was filed by the

petitioner/husband seeking a decree of divorce under Section

13(1)(ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act,1955. By the

impugned judgment and decree, the petition was allowed and

a decree of divorce was granted.

2. Today, a compromise petition under Order XXIII

Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure,1908, CPC has been filed, which

is signed by the parties and verified by the respective

- 3 -

NC: 2025:KHC:54359-DB

MFA No. 7697 of 2022

HC-KAR

Advocates. By means of this compromise petition, all issues

between the parties are stated to have been resolved.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant states that in

view of the compromise petition, the appellant will not press

the instant appeal. Therefore, this appeal is disposed of in

terms of the compromise petition filed today. The terms

incorporated in the compromise petition shall form part of the

decree.

Sd/-

(JAYANT BANERJI)

JUDGE

Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND)

JUDGE

KGR

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23