SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 440888

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
PRAKASH ISHWARAPPA TAPSHETTI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following relief:

A) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 31/10/2025 bearing No.GRL/A/Aa-Ne/CR- 138/2025-26 issued by the 4th respondent vide Annexure-F in the interest of justice and equity and etc.,

B) Issue any other writ or order as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the fact and circumstances of the case and in the aid main relief sought for.

2. This Court, owing to the submission of the counsel appearing for the petitioner, on 06.11.2025 granted an interim order, observing that if the Administrator had not taken charge as on the date of grant of interim order, he shall not be permitted to take charge.

3. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the Administrator has already assumed charge and therefore the interim order, insofar as not taking charge got divulged.

4. In the interregnum, it transpires that the term of the petitioner expired on 04.11.2025. Therefore, if the petitioner’s contention is accepted and the order appointing Administrator is set aside, it would amount to reviving an illegal order, as the Managing Committee,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top