SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 441053

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SHAKTHIKUMAR CHANDRAHAS KYATHANNAVAR – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
WP 109075/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

WRIT PETITION NO. 109075 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE)

BETWEEN:

SHAKTHIKUMAR CHANDRAHAS KYATHANNAVAR,

AGE. 38 YEARS OCC. PRIVATE WORK,

R/O. SHIVABASAVANAGAR, 3RD CROSS, HAVERI.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VIDYASHANKAR G. DALWAI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, EASTERN RANGE, DEVRAJ URS BADAVANE,

B BLOCK, DAVANAGERE,

DIST. DAVANAGERE – 577 006.

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

HANAL ROAD, HAVERI,

DIST.HAVERI – 581 110.

3. THE CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR,

DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCMENT,

HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI – 581 110.

RAKESH

S

4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

HARIHAR

DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCMENT,

D by ig R it A a K lly E S si H g n S ed SHIVAKUAMR SWAMY NAGAR, 1ST STAGE,

HARIHAR

DAVANAGERE – 577 005.

Date: 2025.12.11 16:39:22 +0530

5. THE CIRLE POLICE INSPECTOR,

TOWN POLICE STATION, VIDYANAGAR,

HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI – 581 110.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS BY ISSUING APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE CASE AGAINST THE ACCUSED

PERSONS ON THE COMPLAINT DATED. 13/10/2025 LODGED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS MENTIONED IN THE COMPLAINT AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

A. Issue Writ in the nature of Mandamus by issuing appropriate directions to the Respondents to register the case against the Accused persons on the complaint dated. 13/10/2025 lodged by the Petitioner vide Annexure-B and to take appropriate action against the accused persons mentioned in the Complaint.

B. Any other and further relief as this Hon’ble court deems fit and just in the ends of justice.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was abused while seeking salary in the vicinity of the police station and therefore has filed a complaint against the said incident. Notwithstanding the same, the complaint is not registered. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. The learned AGA submits that the matter is civil in nature, but however would assess the complaint strictly in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1, wherein the Apex Court has held as follows:

“120. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold:

120.1. The registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code, if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation.

120.2. If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not.

120.3. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered. In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the entry of such closure must be supplied to the first informant forthwith and not later than one week. It must disclose reasons in brief for closing the complaint and not proceeding further.

120.4. The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering offence if cognizable offence is disclosed. Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

120.5. The scope of preliminary inquiry is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received but only to ascertain whether the information reveals any cognizable offence.

120.6. As to what type and in which cases preliminary inquiry is to be conducted will depend on the facts and circumstances of each cas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top