SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 441178

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
RAJLAXMI MARKETING – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsels representing the respondents.

2. The learned counsel Ms. Umera appearing for the petitioner would give up the prayer qua the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act.

3. The submission is placed on record.

4. For the rest of the issue that remains, the counsel for the petitioner submits that it is already considered by this Court in W.P. No.108748/2025 disposed of on 24.11.2025. The same reads as follows:

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following prayer:

a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or quashing the order-in-appeal dated 29-03- 2025 passed by the respondent-1 order-in-appeal No.BGM-JJ-ADC-229-2024-25-GST and vide Annexure-A and quash the adjudication order bearing No.BEL-CGST-000-HUB-SUP-RHB-08- 2023-24 dated 07-12-2023 passed by the respondent -2 and vide Annexure –B.

b. And also such other and further relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit considering the facts and circumstances of the case, to meet the ends of justice.

2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.S.G.Solargoppa appearing for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top