THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT AND GEETHA K.B.
THE UPALOKAYUKTA-1 – Appellant
Versus
SRI SURESH S/O VEERAPPA KUMAR – Respondent
WP 102257/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. WRIT PETITION NO.102257 OF 2025 (S-KAT)
BETWEEN:
1. THE UPALOKAYUKTA-1
KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA
REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
2. THE ADDL. REGISTRAR OF ENQUIRIES 16
ADDL. CHARGE OF ADDL. REGISTRAR OF ENQUIRES-15
KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA,
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANIL KALE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. SURESH S/O VEERAPPA KUMBAR
AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
OF HORTICULTURE, ZILLA PANCHAYAT,
SHIRAHATTI, DIST. GADAG.
CHANDRASHEKAR
L K A A X T M TI A M N ANI R/O PLOT NO.74, 62B, MUDENAGUDI LAYOUT,
Digitally signed by
BACK SIDE OF DY.S.P OFFICE, SAMBAPUR ROAD,
CHANDRASHEKAR
L L A oc X a M ti A on N : K H A IG T H TI M CO A U N R I T GADAG, TQ. AND DIST. GADAG-582101.
OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE,
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
3. THE DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE,
LALBAGH, BENGALURU-560004.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. SAHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI IN APPLICATION NO.10871/2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT)
The petitioners-Lokayukta Authorities are before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the order dated 20.12.2024 in Application No.10871/2023 by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Belagavi, For short, ‘Tribunal’, whereunder, the following order is passed:
(i) The application is allowed in part.
(ii) The impugned order bearing No.UPLOK-
1/DE-1162/2017/ARE-16 passed by the 3rd respondent vide Annexure-A3 and impugned recommendation bearing No.UPLOK- 1/DE/1162/2017/ARE-16 dated 26.6.2020 passed by the 2nd respondent (Annexure- A4) and the impugned order bearing No.ThoE/208/ThoSePa/2016 (part-1), dated 17.4.2021 passed by the 1st respondent (Annexure-A8) are quashed.
(iii) The matter is remitted back to the 1st respondent to consider the reply submitted by the applicant to the 2nd show-cause notice and after recording specific findings to pass appropriate orders.
(iv) The time for compliance is two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
2. Heard the learned counsel Sri. Anil Kale for the petitioners and learned counsel Sri. Jagadish Patil for respondent No.1 as well as learned AGA Sri. Sharad V Magadum for respondent Nos.2 & 3. Perused the writ petition papers.
3. The parties would be referred to as per their rankings before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience. The petitioners were the respondents No.2 and 3 and respondent No.1 was the applicant before the Tribunal.
4. Learned counsel Sri. Anil Kale for the petitioners would submit that the finding of the Tribunal at paragraph- 24 to the effect that the reply of the applicant to 2nd show cause notice is not considered before passing the impugned order. It is submitted that if that is so, the Tribunal ought to have remitted the matter back to the respondent No.2/government to consider the reply and pass fresh orders. However, he submits that on the observation that the reply submitted by the applicant to the 2nd show-cause notice is not considered, the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the enquiry report at Annexure-A3 dated 24.06.2020 and recommendation of Upa-Lokayukta dated 26.6.2020 at Annexure-A4. Thus, learned counsel Sri. Anil Kale would pray for modifying the order of the Tribunal, so as to co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.