SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 441603

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
NYAMADEV S/O YALLAPPA GUBACHI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SUREKHA W/O DADASAB ALIYAS DADASAHEB DESAI – Respondent
WP 109799/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

WRIT PETITION NO.109799 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

NYAMADEV S/O. YALLAPPA GUBACHI AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULURE,

R/O. HANGANDI, TQ: RABKAVI-BANAHATTI,

DIST: BAGALKOT- 587315.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. GIRISH A.YADAWAD, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SMT. SUREKHA

W/O. DADASAB @ DADASAHEB DESAI,

AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI,

DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

SAGAR S/O. DADASAB @ DADASAHEB DESAI

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR

LAXMAN SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’s.,

KATTIMANI

L C K o A O c R U a N t R i A o T n T O : A F H K I A GH

DHARWAD BENCH 2. SMT. SACHI W/O. SAGAR DESAI

AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI,

DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

3. SARTHAK S/O. SAGAR DESAI

AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI,

DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

4. PARTHA S/O. SAGAR DESAI AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN I.E. RESPONDENT NO.2.

5. SMT. SHUBHANGI @ SHUBHANGINI W/O. ABHIJIT DESAI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

6. SIDDHANT S/O. ABHIJIT DESAI AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

KRISHNAGOUDA S/O. ALLAPPA DESAI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’s., 7. SMT. SAROJINI W/O. KRISHNAGOUDA DESAI AGE: 72 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

8. SMT. SUNITA W/O. SUBHAS PATIL AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. SAMADOLI, TQ: MIRAJ, DIST: SANAGALI-416404, MAHARASHTRA STATE.

9. SUNIL S/O. KRISHNAGOUDA DESAI AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

10. SMT. PREETI W/O. TEERTHANKAR DESAI AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

11. SHUBHAM S/O. TEERTHANKAR DESAI AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

12. KUMARI. SNEHA D/O. TEERTHANKAR DESAI AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

13. ARUN S/O. YALLAPPA GUBACHI AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

14. MARUTI S/O. YALLAPPA GUBACHI AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

15. SMT. MEENAKSHI W/O. ARJUN KUNCHANALKAR AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANAGANDI, TQ: RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587315.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT S.KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R12;

NOTICE TO R13 TO R15 IS DISPENSED WITH)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03.12.2025 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI, IN MA NO.15/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)

This petition is filed assailing the order dated 03.12.2025 passed in M.A.No.15/2024 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Banahatti, which has granted injunction which has two components.

(a) The defendant No.2/petitioner is restrained from interfering the plaintiff's possession over the suit schedule property.

(b) The defendant No.2/petitioner is restrained from interfering the plaintiff in removing the trees standing in the suit property.

2. The Trial Court has rejected the plaintiffs’ application.

The plaintiffs had only sought injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering the plaintiffs in removing the standing trees. However, the Appellate Court in M.A No.15/2024 has granted injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property whi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top