SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 441759

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
S S COLLEGE OF PHARMACY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 32779/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 32779 OF 2025 (EDN-RES)

BETWEEN:

S. S. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,

NO.72 AND 73, 3RD CROSS,

MUNESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD,

HOODI LAYOUT, AMRUTHAHALLI,

BENGALURU-560 092.

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL,

DR. PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGH,

AGED 50 YEARS,

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Digitally signed

by AASEEFA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

PARVEEN

DEPARTMENT NO.341, VIDHANA SOUDHA

Location: HIGH

BENGALURU-560 001.

COURT OF

KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. BOARD OF EXAMINING AUTHORITY,

DRUGS CONTROL DEPARTMENT,

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,

(FOOD SAFETY AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION),

C/O GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,

SUBBAIAH CIRCLE,

P. KALINGA RAO ROAD,

BENGALURU-560 027.

BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.

3. THE PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA COMBINED COUNCILS BUILDING KOTLA ROAD, ALWAN-E-GHALIB MARG, POST BOC, NO.7020, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 041 REP BY ITS REGISTAR.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 AND R2;

SRI. S.S. HAVERI, ADVOCATE FOR R3;

SMT. MAMATHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARING THAT THE RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES (RGUHS) HAS NO AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION UNDER THE PHARMACY ACT, 1948 OR THE PHARMACY EDUCATION REGULATIONS, 2020 TO CONDUCT DIPLOMA IN PHARMACY (D.PHARM) EXAMINATIONS, AND THAT THE BOARD OF EXAMINING AUTHORITY (BEA) ALONE IS THE COMPETENT EXAMINING BODY FOR SUCH COURSES IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition petitioner seeks the following reliefs: i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS) has no authority or jurisdiction under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 or the Pharmacy Education Regulations, 2020 to conduct Diploma in Pharmacy (D.Pharm) examinations, and that the Board of Examining Authority (BEA) alone is the competent examining body for such courses in the State of Karnataka;

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that the Government Order dated 15.11.2024 No. vide Annexure-C does not authorize RGUHS to conduct D.Pharm examinations independently but only permits it to extend technical and infrastructural assistance to the BEA;

iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that the action of the respondents in assigning examination centers exclusively to RGUHS-affiliated colleges and in denying the petitioner institution a home examination center, as being arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and

19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India;

iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to assign the petitioner institution as a home examination center for its students, considering its past record, infrastructure, and compliance with all regulatory requirements;

v) Pass such other and further orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest and equity.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned HCGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri.S.S.Haveri, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and Smt.Mamatha Kulkarni, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite submission of several representations commencing from Annexures-E and E1 dated 12.12.2024 issued by the petitioner to respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State and Board, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 are not taking any steps to perm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top