THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
G BASAVARAJA
J.C. FLOWERS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MANIKANTAN A M – Respondent
CRL.A 2014/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2014 OF 2024 (A)
BETWEEN:
J.C. FLOWERS ASSET
RECONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.,
(ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS
TRUSTEE OF JCF YES TRUST
2022-23/1)
A COMPANY INCORPORATED
UNDER THE COMPANEIS ACT, 2013, AND
REGISTERED AS AN ASSET
RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY PURSUANT,
TO SECTION 3 OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002,
AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT,
12TH FLOOR CROMPTON GREAVES,
HOUSE, DR ANNIE BESANT ROAD,
WORLI, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA, 400030
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
Digitally signed by
SIGNATORY, MR MANIMARAN S
AASEEFA
PARVEEN …APPELLANT
Location: HIGH (BY SRI S SUSHANT VENKATESH PAI.,ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
AND:
KARNATAKA
MANIKANTAN A M,
AGED MAJOR,
NO. 16, 3RD CROSS, MOTAPPA LAYOUT,
ANANDAPURA VARANASI,
KRISHNARAJAPURAM, NEAR MOTHER,
TERESA SCHOOL, BANGALORE - 560036.
ALSO AT:
MANIKANTAN A M,
AGED MAJOR,
KRAYONS INTERIOR SYSTEMS PVT LTD, NO.43, P M COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, CAMBRIDGE LAYOUT, ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560008.
…RESPONDENT (VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 05.11.2025, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378 CR.PC (FILED U/S 419 OF BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO1) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.08.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XIX ADDL. CMM AND ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, CITY CIVI COURT, BENGALURU (SCCH-17) IN C.C.NO.7261/2021. 2) CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE C.C.NO.7261/2021 TO THE FILE OF THE LEARNED XIX ADDL. CMM AND ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, BENGALURU (SCCH-17)3) GRANT COSTS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The appellant who is the complainant has filed the complaint under Section 138 of NI Act. The Trial Court has taken cognizance against the accused for the offence under Section 138 of NI Act and case came to be registered in C.C.No.7261/2021. On 19.08.2024, the trial Court has passed the following order:
"Complainant present.
Learned counsel for the complainant prays time to take steps. Sufficient time already granted. Inspite of repeated issuance of NBW, the complainant is not taking steps to secure the accused. In the last date of hearing on the request of complainant, it was ordered to Issue NBW by the hands of complainant which shall be executed through jurisdictional police. Even though the NBW is ready it is not collected and it shows that the complainant is reluctant to take steps. No PF is paid and praying for time to take steps. The case is pending from 2021. Hence, no grounds are made out, prayer rejected. In the result the case is dismissed for default."
3. Further, a perusal of the order dated
16.07.2024, it is clear that the complainant has paid PF. The trial Court has passed an order of re-issue NBW to the accused by hands of the complainant, which shall be executed through the jurisdictional police. When the Court has issued NBW to the accused, the same has to be executed through concerned police. In view of the Rule 8 of Chapter 3 of the Karnataka Criminal Rules of Practice, 1968, all processes shall be served or executed by the police, unless the Court which issues the process, otherwise directs. Even if the accused was issued with NBW by the Court, it has to be executed through concerned police. It is not possible to execute non-bailable warrant by the complainant. When the Court has issued NBW to the accused, it is the duty of the concerned police to receive the non-bailable warrant from the Court. The non-collection of the NBW by the complainant is not a genuine ground to dismiss the case. Though the complainant counsel sought time to take steps, the learned Magistrate rejected the prayer of the complainant, which is not sustainable under law. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:
O R D E R
i) Appeal is allowed ii) The order dated 19.08.2024 passed by the XI Addl.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.