IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.8966 OF 2025 (GM-KEB)

BETWEEN:

1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE)

MAJOR WORK DIVISION, K.P.T.C.L,

SUB-DIVISION-1

JCR CIRCLE, 3^RD CROSS, CHITRADURGA-577 501.

2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE)

MAJOR WORK DIVISION, K.P.T.C.L,

SUB-DIVISION -1

JCR CIRCLE, 3^RD CROSS, CHITRADURGA-577 501.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI H.V. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by

MAHALAKSHMI B M SMT. S. SUNAND @ SUNANDAMMA, Location: HIGH W/O. LATE SRI K.N. SHARANAPPA,

COURT OF PRESENTLY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,

KARNATAKA

RESIDING AT KYADIGERE VILLAGE,

KYADIGERE POST, D.S. HALLI RATH,

CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT-577501.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI R. SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-J DATED 17/04/2021 PASSED IN CIVIL MISC. NO.289/2019 ON THE FILE OF SPECIAL II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE AT CHITRADURGA BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER

APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’

GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners-Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) seek to challenge the order dated 17.04.2021 passed by the Special II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga (hereinafter referred to as the 'District Court' for short) in Civil Misc.No.289/2019 whereby the Court awarded diminution value compensation in favour of the respondent.

2. Respondent (Land owner) filed Civil Misc.

No.289/2019 under Section 16 (3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (‘Telegraph Act’ for short), claiming additional compensation for alleged loss caused due to the installation of 220 KV transmission line / tower over her land bearing Re.Sy.No.525/3 measuring 11 acres 09 guntas situated at D.S. Halli Village, Chitradurga Taluk and District. The ground urged by the respondent in the petition was that the KPTCL erected towers over about 3 guntas of her land, destroyed standing crops and trees, reduced the fertility and market value of the land and sought `99,00,000/- for diminishing of the land value. 3. The petitioners (KPTCL) filed objections contending that they have already paid a sum of `6,47,717/- as full and final compensation for the diminution land value as per the Deputy Commissioner's order dated 04.12.2018, and the respondent accepted the compensation without protest, that no crops existed on the land at the time of drawing the line in 2018.

4. The Trial Court partly allowed the miscellaneous petition and awarded additional compensation of `2,72,500/- with 6% interest.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners-

KPTCL and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- claimant.

Petitioners’ contention:

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the full compensation has already been paid towards the diminution in land value as fixed by the Deputy Commissioner for a sum of `6,47,717/-. The compensation has been voluntarily received by the respondent without any objections and the respondent never challenged Ex.R1. Hence, reopening the compensation is impermissible. It is submitted that once the diminution land value was assessed and paid, awarding additional compensation amount towards diminution would amount to duplication. The impugned order has no finding on the Deputy Commissioner's assessment and this amounts to the perversity, which warrants interference by this Court.

Respondent's contention:

7. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent contends that the respondent is the owner and cultivator of land bearing Re.Sy.No.525/3 measuring 11 acres 09, wherein various crops were being grown. The KPTCL destroyed crops over an extent of 3 guntas while erecting 220 KV towers, resulting in substantial loss, reduced fertility and decrease in the market value of the land. The respondent