SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 483

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ANIMAL RIGHTS FUND – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF SECRETARY – Respondent
WP 39140/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

WRIT PETITION NO. 39140 OF 2025 (LB-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. ANIMAL RIGHTS FUND

A TRUST HAVING REGISTRATION

NO. IV 11/99-2000,

HAVING ITS OFFICE 10/4, 1ST FLOOR,

COMFORT MANOR KUMARA KRUPA ROAD, BANGALORE -

560 001,

REPRESENTED BY MR. DILIP BAFNA, TRUSTEE.

2. MS. NEVEENA KAMATH

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

DAUGHTER OF (LATE) R. C. D. KAMATH,

RESIDING AT 260, 18TH C MAIN, 6TH BLOCK,

KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. UDAY SHANKAR M.,ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed

by SHWETHA

RAGHAVENDRA AND:

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

1. CHIEF SECRETARY

KARNATAKA

STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA,

DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES,

M. S. BLDG, BANGALORE - 560 001.

3. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BANGALORE - 560 001.

4. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ

3RD GATE, 3RD FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001.

5. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY HUDSON CIRCLE (CORPORATION CIRCLE), BENGALURU -

560 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-A. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO ENSURE THAT THE PROCESS OF SHIFTING THE STREET DOGS TO DESIGNATED SHELTERS AFTER STERILIZATION AND VACCINATION AND THEIR UPKEEP AND HEALTH BE CLOSELY MONITORED BY THE KARNATAKA ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD (KAWB). AND THAT THE KAWB SHOULD PROVIDE MONTHLY REPORTS TO RESPONDENT NO.2 ON ANY DEPARTURE FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT, 1960 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. Sri. Pawan Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.5.

3. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

(a) direct the respondent no. 2 to ensure that the process of shifting the street dogs to designated shelters after sterilization and vaccination; and their upkeep and health be closely monitored by the Karnataka Animal Welfare Board (KAWB). And that the KAWB should provide monthly reports to respondent no.2 on any departure from the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

(b) direct respondents to allow the petitioners, their officers; and District SPCAs or any AWBI-recognized NGOs engaged in activities of rescuing animals, providing shelter, adoption, etc. to visit the facilities to verify rehabilitation infrastructures, etc. provided to the captured street dogs meet the safety and well-being of the animals in compliance with the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court;

(c) direct the respondents to not treat the ABC Centres as designated shelters;

(d) direct respondent no. 1 that the appointments of NGOs to run dog shelters must be called for in a public advertisement-based approach, and the terms of qualifications in veterinary sciences, years of experience in animal care and financial status have to be made known and;

(e) to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.

4. Essentially, what the petitioners are seeking is for monitoring the direction issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP(Civil) No.14763/2024 and other connected matters. The Hon'ble Apex Court being seized of that matter and having issued directions, which are being monitored by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the relief sought for by the petitioners cannot be considered by this Court. If at all the petitioners have any grievance as regards the action on the part of the respondents, the petitioners would be at liberty to approach the Hon'ble Apex Court.

5. The submission of lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top