SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 649

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
TARA VITASTA GANJU
USHA @ S PADMA – Appellant
Versus
MAHALINGAIAH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

WRIT PETITION NO. 15573 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

USHA @ S.PADMA

D/O S.SHANKAREGOWDA,

W/O RAJU,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/O HOSAKERE VILLAGE,

KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT-571419.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VINAY.D.HOSMATH., ADVOCATE)

AND:

MAHALINGAIAH

S/O KADEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT MAJOR,

R/O HOSAKERE,

KOPPA HOBLI,

MADDUR TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT-571419.

…RESPONDENT

(SERVED)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE PRL ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) MADDUR IN FDP NO.36/2000 DTD.18.10.2019 ON IA

UNDER SECTION 152 OF CPC GRANT.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

ORAL ORDER

1. The present petition has been filed seeking to challenge an order dated 18.10.2019 in O.S.No.291/1988 passed by the Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Maddur, (Mahalingaiah Vs. Usha @ S.Padma) (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Order”). By the Impugned Order, an application under Section 152 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top