SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 775

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
M/S RAYS POWER INFRA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRADE REMEDIES – Respondent
WP 38444/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 38444 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. M/S. RAYS POWER INFRA LIMITED

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER

THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

1ST-21 EVERSHINE MALL NORTH METER CABIN 1,

MALAD WEST MUMBAI-400064

REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER

MR. DEEPAK JANGID

2. M/S. SOLARWORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS LIMITED,

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER

THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013,

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

501, PADMA PALACE,

Digitally signed 86, NEHRU PLACE, SOUTH DELHI,

by NAGAVENI NEW DELHI - 110019,

Location: HIGH REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER

COURT OF MR. KARTIK TELTIA

KARNATAKA

3. M/S. INSOLATION GREEN ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED,

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER

THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013,

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

FLUIDCON HOUSE C-2,

NEW ATISH MARKET EXTENSION,

MANSAROVAR, JAIPUR-302020,

REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER

MR. MANISH GUPTA

4. M/S. BVG INDIA LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BVG HOUSE, PREMIER PLAZA, PUNE-MUMBAI ROAD, CHINCHWAD, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA-411019 REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER MR. PANKAJ DHINGRA

5. M/S. NADBAI SOLAR POWER PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT D-43, JANPATH, SHYAM NAGAR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN - 302019 REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER, MR. YUDHISHTAR JALANDRA …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIKRAM A HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJIT P B., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRADE REMEDIES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, 4TH FLOOR, JEEVAN TARA BUILDING, 5, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110001 REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY

2. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAYANATARA B.G., ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 I.E., MINISTRY OF FINANCE TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON THE IMPUGNED FINAL FINDINGS DATED 29.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRADE REMEDIES (DGTR) IN CASE NO.AD (OI)-24/2024, TITLED "ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATION CONCERNING IMPORTS OF SOLAR CELLS WHETHER OR NOT ASSEMBLED INTO MODULES OR PANELS ORIGINATING IN OR EXPORTED FROM CHINA PR", IN A PROSPECTIVE MANNER TO AN EXTENT THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE ANY ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE IMPORTS/ORDERS OF THE SUBJECT GOODS ALREADY UNDERTAKEN/PLACED BY THE PETITIONERS FOR THEIR ON-

GOING PROJECTS (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING -

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer:

a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No. 2 i.e., Ministry of Finance to take appropriate action on the impugned Final Findings dated 29.09.2025 issued by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) in Case No. AD (OI)-24/2024, titled "Anti-Dumping Investigation concerning imports of Solar Cells whether or not assembled into Modules or Panels originating in or exported from China PR", in a prospective manner to an extent that it does not cause any adverse impact on the imports/orders of the subject goods already undertaken/placed by the Petitioners for their on-going projects; (vide ANNEXURE-A)

b) Declare that the impugned Final Findings dated 29.09.2025 have been rendered in violation of the mandatory provisions of Rule 17, Paragraphs 7 and 8 of Annexure I, and Annexure II and III of the Anti-

Dumping Rules; (vide ANNEXURE-A)

c) Direct the Respondent No. 1 - the Directorate General of Trade Remedies - to conduct a fresh determination in accordance with law, after affording full opportunity of hearing to all interested pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top