IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12869 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

1. SRI JAYANTH G REDDY

S/O. LATE N GUNDAPPA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 104, 2^ND CROSS,

GUNDAPPA REDDY LAYOUT,

CHOLANAGAR,

NEAR RAJIV GHANDHI DENTAL COLLAGE,

BANGALORE NORTH, R.T. NAGAR,

Digitally signed

BANGLORE - 560 032.

by NAGAVENI

…PETITIONER

Location: High

Court of (BY SRI. MANJUNATH G. KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE)

Karnataka

AND:

1. STATE BY J.C. NAGARPOLICE STATION

BENGALURU

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. SANTHOSH RAJ S/O SUSAI RAJ K.

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

R/AT. NO. 2, GOVT. COLLEGE ROAD, KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 036 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 04.06.2025 IN CR.NO.84/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDL.CJM AT BANGALORE REGISTERED BY THE J.C.NAGAR POLICE RESPONDENT POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 318(2), 318(4), 319, 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(1), 340(2), 61(1) R/W SECTION 190 OF BNS, 2023.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner - accused No.5 is before this Court calling in question the registration of a crime in Crime No.84/2025 for offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319, 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(1), 340(2), 61(1) read with Section

190 of the Bharathiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Heard Sri. Manjunath G. Kandekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. K. Nageshwarappa, learned HCGP appearing for respondetn No.1 and have perused the material on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the police after investigation have filed a 'B' report only insofar as accused No.5 is concerned and charge sheet against the other accused.

4. In that light, the subject petition in the form that it is presented would be unnecessary to be considered.

5. Leaving open the remedy available to the petitioner in the event of need, the petition stands disposed.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA)

JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 CT-SG