SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 1048

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
SRI ANJANMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

WRIT PETITION NO. 36112 OF 2025 (BDA-)

BETWEEN:

SRI. ANJANMURTHY

S/O. LATE RAMAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

RESIDING AT MUMMUNENAHALLI VILLAGE,

SOLURU HOBLI,

MAGADI TALUK-562127, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. J. SATHISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE COMMISSIONER,

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.

Digitally BANGALORE-560001.

signed by

VIJAYA P …RESPONDENT

Location:

HIGH COURT (BY SRI. VENKATESHA C., ADVOCATE)

OF

KARNATAKA

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS LEADING FOR NON-EXCUTION OF SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, DIRECT THE BDA TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 13.08.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND

ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

ORAL ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking for issuance of writ of mandamus by way of direction to the respondent - BDA to consider the representation at Annexure-G, made by the petitioner.

2. In terms of the representation, the facts made out are to the effect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top