THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
SRI ANJANMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 36112 OF 2025 (BDA-)
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANJANMURTHY
S/O. LATE RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
RESIDING AT MUMMUNENAHALLI VILLAGE,
SOLURU HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK-562127, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. J. SATHISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.
Digitally BANGALORE-560001.
signed by
VIJAYA P …RESPONDENT
Location:
HIGH COURT (BY SRI. VENKATESHA C., ADVOCATE)
OF
KARNATAKA
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS LEADING FOR NON-EXCUTION OF SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, DIRECT THE BDA TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 13.08.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND
ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ORAL ORDER
The present petition has been filed seeking for issuance of writ of mandamus by way of direction to the respondent - BDA to consider the representation at Annexure-G, made by the petitioner.
2. In terms of the representation, the facts made out are to the effect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.