SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 1227

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
MR. MEHABOOBALI @ MEHABUBALI – Appellant
Versus
MS. S G JAGADEESHA – Respondent
CRL.RP 1861/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1861 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

MR. MEHABOOBALI @ MEHABUBALI,

S/O MOHAMMED GHOUSE,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

MUNICIPALITY EMPLOYEE,

WORKING AT SHIKARIPURA MUNICIPALITY,

SHIKARIPURA TOWN,

SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 427.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D, ADVOCATE)

AND:

MS. S.G. JAGADEESHA,

Digitally

S/O GIDDAPPA SANDEMANE,

signed by

KAVYA R AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

Location: HOME APPLIANCE,

High court

TECHNICIAN SERVICES AND AUTO LINKS,

of

RESIDING AT BEHIND JAYASHREE TALKIES,

Karnataka

HONDAKERI, SHIKARIPURA TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 427.

…RESPONDENT

(RESPONDENT - SERVED)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438

R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING D TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.12.2024 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.155/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS

JUDGE AT SHIVAMOGGA IN SO FAR AS CONDITIONS NO.1 THAT IS HE SHALL DEPOSIT HALF OF THE FINE AMOUNT (EXCLUDING 25 PERCENT ALREADY DEPOSITED) BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT IS CONCERNED TO MEET THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AS ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTION.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

This Criminal Revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.PC is filed by the petitioner/accused with a prayer to set aside the Judgment and Order dated 02.12.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No.155/2023 by the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, to the extent it relates to directing the petitioner to deposit half of the fine amount before the Trial Court (excluding 25% already deposited) vide condition No.1 imposed in the operative portion of the impugned judgment and order.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Respondent who is served has remained unrepresented before this Court.

3. Petitioner herein was convicted for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the Court of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Shikaripura in C.C.No.1006/2017 vide judgment and order dated 30.06.2023 and he was sentenced to pay fine of Rs.4,35,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed in C.C.No.1006/2017, petitioner had filed Crl.A.No.155/2023 before the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, which was allowed by Judgment and Order dated 02.12.2024. The Appellate Court, having set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court, has remanded the case to the Trial Court for fresh disposal on merits subject to certain conditions. Condition No.1 imposed by the Appellate Court in Crl.A.No.155/2023 reads as follows:

"1.He shall deposit half of the fine amount (excluding 25% already deposited) before the Trial Court."

4. Aggrieved by the aforesaid condition petitioner is before this Court.

5. Perusal of the material on record would go to show that the Trial Court had passed the judgment and order of conviction and sentence against the petitioner in C.C.No.1006/2017 without recording the statement of the petitioner/accused as provided under Section 313 of Cr.PC. It is under these circumstances, the Appellate Court has set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court in C.C.No.1006/2017 and has remanded the matter to the Trial Court, with a direction to the Trial Court to record the statement of the petitioner/accused under Section 313 Cr.PC and also give him an opportunity to adduce defence evidence, if any.

6. The material record would go to show that in compliance with the interim order passed in Crl.A.No.155/2023 petitioner had deposited 25% of the fine amount before the Trial Court. The Appellate Court while remanding the matter has directed the petitioner to further deposit half of the fine amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top