Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.G.S. KAMAL, J
SRI. C MUNIRAJU – Appellant
Versus
SRI. S N SUBBAREDDY ALIAS CHINNAKAYALAPALLI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts and allegations against the respondent regarding election irregularities. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondent denies allegations, citing non-compliance with petition requirements. (Para 3) |
| 3. court examines complexities of allegations and evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. final determination and implications of the corruption and false declarations. (Para 10) |
CAV ORDER
(i) To set-aside the election of the Respondent No.1 to the 16th Karnataka Legislative Assembly from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency;
(iii) Pass such other Order/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of this case.
2.1 That the Respondent No.1 in his Form 26 Affidavit filed along with his nomination papers on 20.04.2023 has not disclosed up-to-date details of all his assets and liabilities including that of his wife and dependant daughter. That he has suppressed material information regarding various business entities registered in his name and in the name of his wife. That he has not disclosed details of all the properties owned by him and his wife and dependant daughter. That he has claimed to be the owner of the property which does not belong to him. That he has not disclosed the tru
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
