Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
D K Singh, S Rachaih, JJ
SMT. SUNITHA PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks to quash an earlier committee order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 11) |
| 2. land acquisition challenged in prior court cases. (Para 6 , 10 , 18) |
| 3. claims based on later transactions not entitled to relief. (Para 16 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. subsequent purchasers lack rights to challenge acquisition. (Para 26 , 27 , 29) |
| 5. court grants status quo for two months. (Para 28 , 30 , 31) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the order/report of Justice K.N. Keshavanarayana Committeee (hereinafter referred to as 'the KN Committee') in KNKC No.95/2022 (Rachenahalli) relating to the W.P.Nos.37446-37449/2014 and the Representation Nos.429797 and 429487.
BACKGROUND:
2. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a Preliminary Notification under Section 17 (3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BDA Act') for acquisition of 3339 acres of land for formation of Arkavati Layout on 03.02.2003. A modified Preliminary Notification came to be issued on 16.09.2003 showing the extent of land as 3839 acres 12 guntas situated in the 16 villages including Rachenahalli.
3. No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
