Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
FORCEONE SD PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details regarding tender process (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioner and respondents (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on compliance with tender requirements (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. petition dismissed for lack of compliance (Para 12) |
CAV ORDER
1. Petitioner is before the Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Writ or certiorari, Mandamus or any other direction or order for calling for records about the invitation to tender dated 11.06.2025 issued by the Respondent No.1 (Annexure-B), bearing No. KPTCL/CGM (TECH)/BESS/25-26/002.
ii. Writ, Order or any other direction or order declaring the bid submitted by the successful bidder (L1) as non-complaint and invalid bid.
iii. Writ of certiorari, Mandamus or any other direction or order declaring the action dated 19.08.2025, wherein the petitioners bid was decided as non- responsive, as illegal, and without any basis (Annexure-D)
iv. Writ of certiorari, Mandamus or any other direction or order to qualify our Bid and direct the KPTCL rehold the reverse auction process in an open and transparent manner with sufficient notice. v. Grant such other relief(s) as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
