Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SMT. KANAKA KRISHNA REDDY W/O. KRISHNA REDDY V. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BANNERGHATTA POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property ownership dispute initiated by allegations. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments emphasize nature of the dispute as civil. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on jurisdiction and procedural correctness. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. dispute primarily civil; police involvement not warranted. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. caution against misuse of criminal law for civil disputes. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. order to quash firs, favoring civil resolution. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioners, who are common in all these cases, are before this Court calling in question registration of crime in different crime numbers against these petitioners, while the offences remain common.
2. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
2.1. The complainants, in these cases, are said to have purchased different sites of Mantapa Village, Khata No.345/155/1-09, Hullahalli, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk on 19- 04-2017. The petitioners/accused purchase property from the hands of one N.Bhagyalakshmi and one N.Nagaraju to an extent of 33 guntas in Survey No. 155/1 for certain consideration. The vendors of the petitioners later execute a confirmation deed on account of closure of a civil suit in OS No.452 of 2016 on 09-06-2022. Therefore, the pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
