SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 1803

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRASHEKHAR A – Respondent
CRL.P 13573/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13573 OF 2025 BETWEEN:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE BELLARE POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP)

AND:

CHANDRASHEKHAR A., S/O DEVANNAGOWDA, Digitally AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, signed by NAGAVENI R/AT KANEYURU VILLAGE, Location: BOBBEKERI POST, KADABA TALUK, High Court DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 221.

of Karnataka …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.06.2022 PASSED IN CR.NO.15/2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC I CLASS SULYA, D.K THEREBY GRANTING STATUTORY BAIL IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT/ACCUSED U/S

437 R/W SEC.167(2) OF CR.P.C.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

Heard Sri.B.N.Jagadeesha, learned Addl. SPP appearing for the petitioner and have perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner is the State, is at the doors of this Court calling in question the order of the concerned Court dated 7.6.2022, which grants statutory bail as obtaining under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.

3. A perusal at the order impugned would indicate that the police have filed a charge sheet prior to the expiry of 90 days but have withdrawn the charge sheet to file a fresh or a separate charges sheet. In that light, there is no separate charge sheet filed in the eye of law. The charge sheet not having been filed within 90 days as obtaining under Section

167 of Cr.P.C., the order impugned in the subject petition would not warrant any interference as the accused has already been enlarged on bail on the said score.

4. Petition lacking in merits, stands rejected Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA)

JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top