SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 1822

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SMT K SUMATHI – Appellant
Versus
SRI M B KAMBANNA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 597 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. K. SUMATHI W/O SRI. R. MURALI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

2. SRI. R. MURALI S/O LATE RAMANATHAN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

3(a) SMT. K. SULOCHANA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRs SRI. K. SUKUMAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE KALIYAPERUMAL R/A NO.25, KOTHANUR NEAR SHIVA TEMPLE DR. SHIVARAMA KARANATH NAGAR BANGALORE-560 077 ALONG WITH 1ST APPELLANT K. SUMATHI SL.NO. 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT PORTION OF PREMISES NO.82, ITI LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN ROAD BENSON TOWN POST BANGALORE-560 046.

…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K. NARASIMHA MURTHY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SRI. M.B. KAMBANNA S/O YARAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO.97, M.R.S PALYA, NANDIDURG ROAD BENSON TOWN POST BANGALORE-560046.

2. SRI. K. JOHN RAVISHANKAR SINCE DEAD NO LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

3. SMT. NAGAPUSHAM W/O LATE R.M. SATHYARAJ AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 4. SRI. PURSHOTHAM S/O LATE R.M. SATHYARAJ AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BOTH ARE R/A NO.7, 145-B CROSS CHINNAPPA GARDEN BANGALORE-560 010.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. J. PRABAKAR, SRI. M.B. SHESHAGIRI & SRI. D. MURUGAN, ADVOCATES FOR R1;

V/O DATED 03.07.2013, NOTICE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top