Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.Krishna Kumar, J
Sri Palakolanu Sudhakar Reddy, Smt Palakolanu Sowjanya – Appellant
Versus
Smt Chanchu Sandhya Rani, Sri Chunchu Rama Krishna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks amendment of earlier rent orders based on subsequent conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments were made regarding payment obligations and their legality. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. the court evaluated the evidential basis for tenancy and rent claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court ruled on the necessity of payment during litigation. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition by the defendants in Commercial O.S.No.134/2025 is directed against the impugned order dated 18.12.2025 passed on I.A.No.II whereby the said application filed by the respondents-plaintiffs under Section 151 CPC for a direction to the petitioners-defendants to pay damages in a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- per month was partly allowed by the Trial Court, which directed the petitioners-defendants to pay a sum of Rs.3,70,000/- per month for use and occupation of the schedule property from the month of institution of the suit till disposal of the suit on merits.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the respondents-plaintiffs instituted the aforesaid suit against the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
