THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
T G RAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident involves alleged obstruction of police duties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal definitions examined, including wrongful restraint and definitions of assault. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.3886/2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 332 , 353, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC .
2. Heard Sri. Girishkumar R., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K. Nageshwarappa, learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. Facts in brief germane are as follows:
The petitioner is an Advocate by profession and on an incident that happens on 20.09.2011, a crime comes to be registered by the respondent No.1 on the score that the petitioner had blocked or stopped the respondent No.2/complainant, a Police Sub-Inspector, from moving anywhere, which would become an offence under Section 341 of the IPC . The complaint also states that the petitioner had blocked the complainant who is a public servant in discharge of his official duties by use of force, which would become an offence under Section 353 of the . On the said complaint, a crime comes to be registered in Crime No.386/201




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.