Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
T.G. RAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the essence of the case originates from an incident where the petitioner was accused of impeding police on duty. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. overview of legal standards indicates fundamental errors in applying ipc sections to the case. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 3. permitting continuation of proceedings would constitute an abuse of process, thus requiring quashment. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C. No.25656/2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 323, 332, 341, 353, 427 read with Section 149 of the IPC .
2. Heard Sri. Girishkumar R., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K. Nageshwarappa, learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:
The petitioner is an Advocate by profession and on an incident that happens on 09.06.2003, a crime comes to be registered by respondent No.1 on the score that several advocates, were involved in a scuffle with the police on the said date. The complaint states that the police were restrained from moving anywhere, which would become an offence punishable under Section 341 of the IPC . The complaint also sta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
