Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
MR. SANDEEP K. REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing arguments from both sides. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. facts of the case regarding the complaint. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. interpretation of sections for criminal intimidation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court quashes proceedings based on legal principles. (Para 12) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following relief:
"Wherefore, considering the fact circumstances of the case, it is most humbly prayed before this honourable court that the case pending in in C.C. No.8580/2018 arising out of crime No.344/2016 pertaining to Kaggalipura Police Station, for the offences punishable under section 504, 506 read with section 34 of IPC now pending on the file of Honourable Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore, may kindly be quashed in the interest of justice and equity."
2. On hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 - State, this Court, on 07.01.2026, had passed the following order:
"Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.8580 of 2018 registered
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
