Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Suraj Govindaraj, J
G Mahendravarama – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allotment inquiry and initial petitioner’s claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondents’ defense against claims and allegations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. legal questions relating to rights and proper allotment. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court’s position on entitlements and outcome of cases. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final orders regarding dismissals and options for the petitioner. (Para 13) |
CAV ORDER
1. The Petitioner is before the Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing allotment dated 29.02.2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent in favour of the 5th Respondent made in No. KIADB/MYS/24509/5140/2023-24 vide Annexure-A, in the greater interest of justice, equity and good conscience.
b. Issue a consequential writ of mandamus commanding the Respondent authorities to issue possession certificate and execute lease cum sale deed in favour of the Petitioner pursuant to the allotment letters dated 19.04.2021 and 05.05.2021 as per Annexure-D & E respectively, considering the representations dated 23.09.2021, 23.06.2023 vide Annexure-H, J & K respectively, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Petitioner, a member of the Scheduled Caste Community, had applied for a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
