Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
PEEKA VEERASWAMY S/O PEEKA BAPANAIAH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to registration of fir based on procedural delays. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of the complaint and previous proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. the relationship between parties and delay in filing the fir. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 4. court's rationale for quashing based on lack of prima facie case. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioners – accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 in Crl.P.No.1975/2023 and petitioner – accused No.3 in Crl.P.No.1978/2023 are before this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No.8/2023, pending before the 6th Additional District and Sessions Court, Mysuru district, for the offences under Sections 504, 506, 143, 149 of the IPC and Sections 3 (2)(va), 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (‘the Act’ for short).
2. Heard Sri Udaya Holla, learned senior counsel for Sri Manu P. Kulkarni, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Vinay Mahadevaiah, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1, in both the petitions. Sri Arjun S., learned counsel for respondent No.2 has remained throughout absent.
3. This Court on 06.01.2026, had passed the following order:
“ORDER
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
