Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G. Pandit, K. V. Aravind, JJ
THE LEGAL MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GIC LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VAISHALI HIREN PARMAR W/O LATE HIREN MADHUSUDAN PARMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment outlines appeal basis regarding accident involving deceased. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented from both insurer and claimants on accident liability. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court reflections on evidence and witness reliability. (Para 8) |
| 4. legal interpretations concerning income assessments and future prospects. (Para 10) |
| 5. final compensation award emphasized jury's established positions. (Para 15) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND)
Heard Sri B. Pradeep, learned counsel for the appellant, who is respondent No.2 in the Cross-objection; and Sri Bhat Ananta Krishna, learned counsel respondent Nos.1 to 4, the Cross-objectors in the Cross-objection.
2. The appeal is filed by the insurer challenging the judgment and award dated 23.01.2024 passed in MVC No.5736/2021 by the II Additional Judge and ACMM, Court of Small causes, MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH.13), Tribunal, disputing the involvement of the offending vehicle, its liability, and the quantum of compensation. The cross-objection is filed by the claimants.
3. For brevity, the parties are referred to as per their ranks before the Tribunal.
4. The petitioners filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
