Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O LATE C.V. MUTTU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case initiation and background facts presented. (Para 1 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. court observations highlight the legal implications of the incidents. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 3. advocates present their arguments regarding the accusations. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioners/accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 in Special Case No.209/2023 are at the doors of this Court calling in question the entire proceedings.
2. Heard the learned counsel Sri. K.B.K. Swamy appearing for the petitioners and the learned HCGP Sri. Vinay Mahadevaiah appearing for the respondent No.1. The second respondent/complainant though served on 29.02.2024 has remained unrepresented even today. Therefore, the petitioner and the learned HCGP appearing for the state are heard in the matter.
3. Facts in brief germane are as follows:
3.1. Accused No.1 and the complainant get married.The marriage takes place on 31.08.2020. The relationship between accused No.1 and the complainant is said to have floundered. On the floundering of the relationship several proceedings are instituted against each other. The impugned proceedings come about on a complaint being registered by second respondent - wife on 16.06.2023. The said complaint becomes a crime
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
