IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14905 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS))

BETWEEN:

DIVYA J D/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 419

27TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS NAKKALU BANDE JAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK EAST, BENGALURU - 560 011 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.ASHOKA T., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. OMKAR BASAVA PRABHU., ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA THE STATE OF KARNATAKA MURTHY RAJASHRI THROUGH THILAKNAGAR POLICE STATION Location: HIGH REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT BAIL IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, DIVYA J IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.240/2025 REGISTERED BY THE THILAKNAGAR POLICE STATION, AND PRESENTLY PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE CJM, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 103(1) OF THE BNS 2023, AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO RELEASE HER ON BAIL.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.2 under Section

483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime No.240/2025 of Tilak Nagar Police Station registered for offence punishable under Section 103(1) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent -State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is girl aged 19 years. There is no any allegation of any assault by the petitioner on the deceased. The overtact of assault with knife is alleged against accused No.1. The allegation against the petitioner is conspiring to kill the deceased and calling the deceased to the spot, facilitating accused No.1 to assault and kill him. As the Charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.11.2025. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. With these, he prays to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent –State would contend that there is conspiracy between petitioner and accused No.1 to kill the deceased. In furtherance of the said conspiracy, petitioner called the deceased to the spot wherein the accused No.1 has assaulted the deceased with knife and caused his death. The petitioner has threatened C.W.1 - the father of the deceased to kill the deceased if he threatens her to discontinue her contact with his son. The charge sheet materials show prima facie case against the petitioner for offences alleged against her. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard learned counsels, this Court has perused the charge sheet and other materials placed on record.

6. As per charge sheet, the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had love affair with accused No.1 and subsequently there was break-up. Thereafter, the petitioner started affair with the deceased. The father of the deceased threatened the petitioner to stop contact with his son and at that time the petitioner had threatened the father of the deceased to kill the deceased. Thereafter, the petitioner conspired by accused No.1 to kill the deceased and in furtherance of the said conspiracy, the petitioner has made phone call to the deceased and called him to the spot. Accused No.1 assaulted him with knife on his chest and due to which the deceased succumbed to the injury. Considering the above aspects, the allegation against the petitioner is that she conspired with accused No.1 and in furtherance of the conspiracy she secured the deceased to the spot. There is no any overtact alleged against this petitioner assaulting the deceased. The petitioner is girl a