Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
M/S KPR CONSTRUCTIONS – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under arbitration and conciliation act for appointing arbitrators. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding arbitration and contractor's rights. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's consideration of the arbitration clause validity and implications. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 4. court confirms arbitrability of disputes under contract terms. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. judgment allows cmp and appoints arbitrators. (Para 13) |
ORAL ORDER
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the Act’) seeking for the appointment of the Arbitrators to resolve the disputes between the parties in accordance with the Agreement dated 20.03.2017 at Annexure C in conformity with the provisions under section 12(5) r/w schedule 7 of the Act.
2. Brief facts, leading rise to the filing of this Petition are as follows:
3. Respondent No. 2 had called for tenders vide E-Tender Notice dated 27.05.2016 for the work of Gadag - Hotgi Doubling – Substructure of 2 major Bridges. In response to the said tender notice, the petitioner submitted its tender and became successful lowest eligible tenderer and the same was accepted by the responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
