Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
MR CHRISTOPHER CHARLES KAMOLINS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background about the petitioner and the employment visa. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner argues legality of leave india notice. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's observations on the application of natural justice. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. writ petition rendered infructuous due to expiry of visa. (Para 23) |
| 5. court dismisses the writ petition. (Para 24) |
CAV ORDER
1. The petitioner who is an Australian national/citizen is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the Leave India Notice dated May 1, 2019 bearing reference No. 03/FM/BOI/2019-LIN-162, produced as Annexure-A to the petition.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent not to take any further action pursuant to the Leave India Notice produced at Annexure-A and to reverse any action that may have been taken pursuant to the said Leave India Notice; and
iii. Grant any other relief that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit having regard to the facts and circumstances of this Case, in the interests of justice and equity.
2. The petitioner is an Australian citizen holding a valid Australian passport. He asserts that he was granted an Em
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
