Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
SMT. PREETHI SATISH – Appellant
Versus
SRI. M. NAGARAJ – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court proceedings initiated for amendment application. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. amendments are evaluated based on necessity and their impact on case fundamentals. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition results in the allowance of the amendment to the plaint. (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition by the plaintiff in O.S.No.5295/2020 on the file of the XL Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, is directed against the impugned order passed on I.A.No.1/2022, whereby the said application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint by incorporating additional pleadings, additional prayers and to insert schedules was dismissed by the Trial Court.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioner-plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit against the respondent-defendant for permanent injunction and for other reliefs in relation to the suit schedule immovable property. Subsequent to the said suit having been contested by the respondents- defendants, during the course of plaintiff’s evidence, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
