Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH, VENKATESH NAIK T, JJ
ABUBAKKAR @ MONU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding witness reliability and contradictions. (Para 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. evidence surrounding the attack and victim's death. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court findings on evidence sufficiency and implications for conviction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. evaluation of circumstantial evidence necessity. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final conclusions on conviction based on evidence. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and also the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent-State.
2. This appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and imposing rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and accused is also entitled for benefit under Section 428 of Cr.PC.
4. The prosecution in order to prove the case, examined P.W.1 to P.W.23 and also marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.32 and also MO.1 to MO.6 are marked. The defendants have not lead any evidence or marked any documents. The Trial court having considered both oral and documentary evidence available on record, answered the issue with regard to the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
